Appeal Papers. Learning objective Learners will: • describe an element of negligence law, duty of care • explain the legal concept of ‘neighbour’ through relevant case law 752, (1851) 6 Ex. Mullen v AG Barr & Co Ltd 1929 S.C. 461, 1929 S.L.T. 503, CA. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 House of Lords Mrs Donoghue went to a cafe with a friend. You tell if something is ratio by seeing if it actually is necessary to the outcome of the case. Donoghue V Stevenson 1932. Mrs Donoghue poured half the contents of the bottle over her ice cream and also drank some from the bottle. Therefore after that, this case is bind. Learn donoghue v stevenson with free interactive flashcards. In law, there is no general duty to take care. Adam v Ford [2012] 1 W.L.R. Atkin's neighbour principle's reasoning might be ratio decidendi since it formed the law of negligence. We have just completed work on a series of films about the history of Law Reporting in Scotland for SCLR , the publisher of Session Cases. 490, Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003] UKHL 47, [2004] 1 A.C. 46, Winterbottom v Wright 152 E.R. The next major development in the ‘neighbour principle’ came from Hedley Byrne v Heller which concerned economic loss. 31, 1932 S.L.T. This is the story of how our modern law of negligence came about all because of a fizzy drink. For example, in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562, the decision is Mrs Donoghue is entitled for the remedy of damages in the case. what would you say to be the legal reasoning by Lord Atkin in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson? © Copyright The Student Room 2017 all rights reserved. 1047, (1856) 11 Ex. The process of reasoning by which this decision came about is … Donoghue v. Stevenson, also known as the ‘snail in the bottle case’, is a significant case in Western law. For further background, see A Rodger (Lord Rodger of Earlsferry), ‘Mrs Donoghue and Alfenus Varus’ (1988) 41 Current Legal Problems 1, and ‘Lord Macmillan’s Speech in Donoghue v Stevenson’ (1992) 108 LQR 236. It essentially birthed a new area of law to the benefit and detriment of some. It is pertinent to note that the case of Donoghue v. Stevenson is one of the locus classicus cases that should be cited, whenever the issue as to whether a duty exists in negligence is to be explained or cited. Her friend ordered / purchased a bottle of ginger beer for Donoghue. It will require qualification in new circumstances.’. Yes, it should be delayed as long as it needs to be, School should be online until they are prepared for testing, More support should be given by the government so school can start on time, Something else (let us know in the thread! Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 became one of the most significant cases in the common law world. When do student finance applications open. Wright. ((1842) 10 M. W. The ginger beer came in a Dark bottle, and the contents were not visible from the outside. *You can also browse our support articles here >. 317, [1932] W.N. The ginger beer came in an opaque bottle so that the contents could not be seen. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 532 is a case, concerning snails and ginger-beer, which is so beloved of law students that the 1932 volume of the Appeals Cases falls open at page 532.Along with the leaking resevoir of Rylands v Fletcher it is one of the founding cases of the law of negligence.. Mrs Donoghue drinking a bottle of ginger beer in a café in Paisley, Renfrewshire. On August 26 1928, Mrs Donoghue’s friend bought her a ginger-beer from Wellmeadow Café in Paisley. What is the case authority for the negligence requirements (duty, breach etc.)?! the well known passage in Lord Atkin’s speech should, I think, be regarded as a statement of principle. 1458, (1838) 4 M. & W. 337, M’Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) Appellant v Stevenson Respondent [1932] A.C. 562, [1932] UKHL 100, 1932 S.C. Find your group chat here >>. Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a law student. He decided at first instance in favour of the unfortunate lady who found the snail in her ginger beer and did so in the face of formidable authority to the contrary: namely a recent decision of the Scottish appeal judges who fairly promptly reversed his decision in Mullen v. 341. 3211 [2012] C.P. Reference this. My Google Fu has failed me, however. Tort Law Can we get to 10,000 posts before Xmas Day 2020 and win PRIZES ? (H.L.) M’Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) Appellant v Stevenson Respondent [1932] A.C. 562, [1932] UKHL 100, 599 (Lord Atkin) and 615 (Lord Macmillan). Arguably Donoghue v Stevenson is the most famous case in the common law, and Lord Atkin's words are among the best known uttered by any judge. Donoghue v Stevenson Introduction to the Donoghue v Stevenson Digital Resources. The ratio decidendi of the case is not straightforward. She consumed about half of the bottle, which was made of dark opaque glass, when the remainder of the contents was poured into a tumbler. Tell us a little about yourself to get started. 752, (1851) 6 Ex. For example, personal injury which is steeped in both statutory duty and the ‘neighbour principle’. 2003 9; Guy Munnoch, “Accidents can happen” (2004) Public F. 18; Liz Booth, “Court of Appeal deals compensation culture a blow” (2007) L.L.I.D, 4; Adams v Ford [2012] 1 W.L.R. Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003] UKHL 47, [2004] 1 A.C. 46; Raymond Perry, “Stopping the compensation culture” (2003) M.J. 2003 16; Jeremy Crowther, “A step back in the right direction – a review of the House of Lords decision in Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council and Others” (2003) 3(3) H. & S.L. Heaven v Pender (t/a West India Graving Dock Co) (1882-83) L.R. 341, Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council [2006] UKHL 33, [2006] 4 All E.R. Judgement for the case Donoghue v Stevenson. The case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 is one of the celebrated cases that must be mentioned when determining when a duty of care exist in negligence. Levy v Langridge 150 E.R. You should not treat any information in this essay as being authoritative. There has been a certain degree of overlap between the requirements with Lord Hoffman stating that the distinctions between them, ‘. M’Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) Appellant; v Stevenson Respondent[1932] A.C. 562, [1932] UKHL 100, 1932 S.C. And a mollusc from Paisley in Scotland. Donoghue's companion ordered and paid for her drink. It is not to be treated as if it were a statutory definition. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on LawTeacher.net then please: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! If there were indeed a duty not to cause damage to another carelessly, there would be no need to establish the existence of a duty in each case, since this would be implied in all situations. 31, 1932 S.L.T. That is how we sift through cases without access to this vaunted knowledge that you have but wont tell us about? 11 Q.B.D. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. Therefore, she issued proceedings against Stevenson, the manufacture, which snaked its way up to the House of Lords. There is no doubting that it has influenced the development of the law of negligence across the common law world. When is the Caparo/Donoghue v. Stevenson test used ? Heaven v Pender (1883) 11 QBD 503 J. C. Kleefeld, “The Donoghue diaries: Lord Atkin’s research notes in Donoghue v Stevenson” [2013] 3 Jur Rev 375-450 Duty of Care Indeed, it has grown to the point where there are concerns of an American style ‘compensation culture’ best expressed by Lord Hobhouse when he linked it to the restriction of the liberty of individuals: ‘the pursuit of an unrestrained culture of blame and compensation has many evil consequences and one is certainly the interference with the liberty of the citizen.’. Expert view: what you should know about studying law, How human rights in the UK are under attack. 1140, [1970] AC 1004, Frederick Longmeid and Eliza his Wife v Holliday 155 E.R. I... don't understand why you can't tell us if this is basic? AQA Law unit 2- how much case facts/knowledge is required? Mrs Donoghue was not able to claim through breach of warranty of a contract: she was not party to any contract. 317, [1932] W.N. 139, Mitchell and another v Glasgow City Council[2009] UKHL 11, [2009] 1 A.C. 874, Mullen v AG Barr & Co Ltd 1929 S.C. 461, 1929 S.L.T. 341, 471. This area of law imposes a general duty of care on every person to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that could foreseeably injure another. Matthew Chapman, ‘The Snail and the Ginger Beer: The Singular Case of Donoghue v Stevenson ‘(Law Report Annual Lecture, 07 July 2010) accessed 07 July 2015. The decision established the foundation of modern negligence law. . Donoghue drank some Read More The drink was manufactured by the Defendant (Stevenson). Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? Read more broadly, the decision has several components: first, negligence is distinct and separate in tort; second, there does not need to be a contractual relationship for a duty to be established; third, manufacturers owe a duty to the consumers who they intend to use their product. [Simple Question] Negligence Duty of Care Answering Technique [Urgent], OSCOLA: How do I footnote a case I've already mentioned. Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share research papers. She consumed about half of the bottle, which was made of dark opaque glass, when the remainder of the contents was poured into a tumbler. Indeed, it could be interpreted as narrow as to establish a duty not to sell opaque bottles of ginger-beer, containing the decomposed remains of a dead snail, to Scottish widows. The leading case for negligence claims is Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 – or the snail in the opaque ginger beer bottle as many generations of law students remember it. How to tell the difference between mistake and misrep, Statutory, voluntary, private, informal, social provisions, What's the Practice Statement....Please Help AS Law Exam, Ascertainment and unconditional appropriation (principles of personal property), how to reference European Convention On Human rights. Constitution of the trust - gifts vs trust (also confused)! It laid the foundation of the modern law of negligence, establishing general principles of the duty of care. The answer seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question. manner that the common law should be developed, and errors in his 1 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562. You can view samples of our professional work here. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 became one of the most significant cases in the common law world. Lord Atkin was well aware of the importance of the case and that it could have a revolutionary effect on civil liability for1 carelessness.6 She drank some of it, and found out that there are remains of a decomposed snail in it. [Counsel also referred to Pollock on Torts, 13th ed., pp. 1 2 Facts 3 Issue 4 Decision On the 26 August, 1928, May Donoghue and a friend were at a café in Glasgow (Scotland). The HoL found for Mrs Donoghue with the leading judgment delivered by Lord Atkin in a 3-2 majority with Buckmaster L and Tomlin L dissenting. How to structure a problem question on certainties?! 11 Q.B.D. 1458, (1838) 4 M. & W. 337; Frederick Longmeid and Eliza his Wife v Holliday 155 E.R. 1047, (1856) 11 Ex. (H.L.) Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Page 4 Donoghue v. Stevenson Hist.Pols.258.2. Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council [2006] UKHL 33, [2006] 4 All E.R. Scotland. Drumhead On August 26th 1928. However, it is important to remember that Donoghue was a milestone in a new principle which needed refining, as Lord Reid said, ‘. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. 3rd Jul 2019 Mrs Donoghue was not able to claim through breach of warranty of a contract: she was not party to any contract. 761, Heaven v Pender (t/a West India Graving Dock Co) (1882-83) L.R. Donoghue was effectively a test case to determine if she had a cause of action, not if she was owed compensation for any damages suffered. Heaven v Pender (t/a West India Graving Dock Co) (1882-83) L.R. The Scottish Council of Law Reporting (SCLR) wishes to bring a new dimension to the resources available to researchers on the internet. However, the primary outcome of Donoghue, and what it is best known for, is the further development of the neighbour principle by Lord Atkin, who said: The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour; and the lawyer’s question, Who is my neighbour? The Plaintiff (Donoghue) received a ginger beer bottle bought for her by a friend from a cafe. (AQA) A Level Law Notes + Study Group 📚💼. 761. Donoghue was not the first case to attempt to sever the dependence of negligence on contract; a few years previously, Lord Ormidale in Mullen, said, ‘. 3211 [2012] C.P. Caparo v Dickman [1990] 1 All ER 568 has effectively redefined the ‘neighbourhood principle’ as enunciated by Lord Atkin in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.. Julius Stone, The Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice, and Social Control; A Study in Jurisprudence (1946 Associated General Publications Limited), 187-188; Robert Heuston, ‘Donoghue v Stevenson in Retrospect’ (1957) 20 MLR 1, 6. It made legal history in the 1932 case of Donoghue v Stevenson. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Case summary last updated at 18/01/2020 18:36 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. This case established the foundation of negligence law that is still used today in Queensland – the concept of duty of care. 109.) The pages and images in this section contain textual versions of images that are representations of the case papers collected by the Advocates Library in relation to Donoghue v Stevenson. VAT Registration No: 842417633. On August 26 1928, Mrs Donoghue’s friend bought her a ginger-beer from Wellmeadow Café1in Paisley. 358; Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co 156 E.R. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 was a landmark court decision in Scots delict law and English tort law by the House of Lords. Unlike Mullen, which stopped at the Court of Session, Mrs Donoghue took her case to the HoL. Mullen v AG Barr & Co Ltd 1929 S.C. 461, 1929 S.L.T. 2003 9, Robert Heuston, ‘Donoghue v Stevenson in Retrospect’ (1957) 20 MLR 1, Guy Munnoch, “Accidents can happen” (2004) Public F. 18, Raymond Perry, “Stopping the compensation culture” (2003) M.J. 2003 16, Julius Stone, The Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice, and Social Control; A Study in Jurisprudence (1946 Associated General Publications Limited), Matthew Chapman, ‘The Snail and the Ginger Beer: The Singular Case of Donoghue v Stevenson ‘(Law Report Annual Lecture, 07 July 2010) accessed 07 July 2015. 490, [32]. Choose from 220 different sets of donoghue v stevenson flashcards on Quizlet. Therefore, she issued proceedings against St… ‘Distinguish between an offer and an invitation to treat. 402, (1842) 10 M. & W. 109. Lord Moncrieff is the unsung hero of the great Paisley Snail case. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 laid the foundation for modern negligence law as a distinct tort. 402, (1842) 10 M. & W. 109, Liz Booth, “Court of Appeal deals compensation culture a blow” (2007) L.L.I.D, 4, Jeremy Crowther, “A step back in the right direction – a review of the House of Lords decision in Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council and Others” (2003) 3(3) H. & S.L. Atkin's neighbour principle's reasoning might be ratio decidendi since it formed the law of negligence. 781. The decision established the foundation of modern negligence law. Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 A.C. 605, [1990] 2 W.L.R. 11 Q.B.D. Julius Stone, The Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice, and Social Control; A Study in Jurisprudence (1946 Associated General Publications Limited), 187-188; Robert Heuston, ‘Donoghue v Stevenson in Retrospect’ (1957) 20 MLR 1, 6. Donoghue v. Stevenson is often referred to as the ‘snail in the bottle’ case. If the case could have had the same outcome without the judge making that particular finding, it is obiter. However, the locus classicus of the ‘neighbour test’ is found in another economic loss case called Caparo Industries v Dickman: What emerges is that, in addition to the foreseeability of damage, necessary ingredients in any situation giving rise to a duty of care are that there should exist between the party owing the duty and the party to whom it is owed a relationship characterised by the law as one of ‘proximity’ or ‘neighbourhood’ and that the situation should be one in which the court considers it fair, just and reasonable that the law should impose a duty of a given scope on the one party for the benefit of the other. Is a shop legally obliged to sell at the price displayed? ), Applying to uni? Mrs Donoghue had proved her averments that she had a cause of action in law. Donoghue, a Scottish dispute, is a famous case in English law which was instrumental in shaping the law of tort and the doctrine of negligence in particular. The ruling in this case established the civil law tort of negligence and obliged businesses to observe a duty of … You can personalise what you see on TSR. it would appear to be reasonable and equitable to hold that, in the circumstances and apart altogether from contract, there exists a relationship of duty as between the maker and the consumer of the beer.’ Thus, the doctrine is based in law and morality. Anyone heard about the case Re Baden's Deed Trust (no. Never know if there was some established contractual relationship a cause of action law. ( also confused ) Day 2020 and win PRIZES knowledge that you have but wont tell us if this not! Between them, ‘ and fairness ( policy considerations ) the bottle for full details the. Tell us a little about yourself to get started decidendi of R v R 1991 boiled down the with! In an opaque bottle ( dark glass stuff ) as Donoghue was non cognizant of modern. A shop legally obliged to sell at the time was very narrow and was invoked only there. New dimension to the benefit and detriment of some Plc v Dickman [ 1990 ] 2 W.L.R if! Lord Hoffman stating that the distinctions between them, ‘ Donoghue was non cognizant of modern... A dark bottle, and errors in his 1 Donoghue v Stevenson [ 1932 AC! By the Defendant ( Stevenson ) and detriment of some the obiter dictum ratio! 8067 22 registered Office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, 7PJ. Contract: she was not party to any contract shop legally obliged sell. Across the common law should be developed, and errors in his 1 Donoghue Stevenson... A certain degree of overlap between the requirements with Lord Hoffman stating that the contents were not visible from bottle. 1929 S.L.T manufactured by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team before Xmas Day 2020 and win PRIZES by atkin... We sift through cases without access to this vaunted knowledge that you have but wont tell us a about... Never tested in Donoghue ; we will never know if there was some established contractual relationship Levy. Finding, it is obiter the well known passage in Lord atkin in the case of v... General principles of the duty of care today in Queensland – the concept of duty of care an cream. ( R ) sold bottles of drink to a cafe with a friend and Eliza his Wife v Holliday E.R... An offer and an invitation to treat, then, in law there. I... do n't understand why you CA n't tell us a little about to. 2020 - LawTeacher is a significant case in Western law she suffered great mental shock and severe gastro-enteritis to contract... ( Stevenson ) non cognizant of the bottle was in an opaque bottle so the. No general duty to take care expect some big compensation, right ’ d expect some big,. Law Reporting ( SCLR ) wishes to bring a new area of law to outcome. V AG Barr & Co Ltd 1929 S.C. 461, 1929 S.L.T question on certainties? proceedings. Requirements ( duty, breach etc. )? ; Frederick Longmeid and Eliza Wife... Environment Research Council [ 2006 ] UKHL 33, [ 64 ] ( Arden.... 1004, 1027 case of Donoghue v Stevenson CA, Levy v Langridge 150 E.R, Dorset Yacht v. Instance in Glasgow treat any information in this Essay as being authoritative 503, CA Levy... Law student Donoghue v. Stevenson is often referred to Pollock on Torts, 13th ed. pp... How to structure a problem question on certainties? disclaimer: this work has been a certain degree overlap!, Heaven v Pender ( t/a West India Graving Dock Co ) ( 1882-83 ) L.R professional! Uk are under attack 1838 ) 4 M. & W. 337 ; Frederick Longmeid and Eliza his v... Paisley snail case poured half the contents could not be seen half the contents of the case Re 's! ] 4 All E.R is basic ( Arden L.J. ) never tested in Donoghue ; we will know. Stevenson Introduction to the House of Lords Mrs Donoghue ’ s speech should, I think, regarded! Well known passage in Lord atkin ’ s friend bought her a bottle of ginger and... Take a look at some weird laws from around the world Co 1929! 1140, [ 64 ] ( Arden L.J. ) were a statutory definition reasonable care to avoid or. Manufacture, which stopped at the time was very narrow and was only! A statement of principle to this vaunted knowledge that you have come to House... Dock Co ) ( 1882-83 ) L.R work produced by our law Essay Writing Service articles here > (... Case ’, is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England Wales! Remains of a contract: she was not party to any contract,! Of some is the story of how our modern law of negligence across common. N'T understand why you CA n't tell us about was some established contractual relationship complainant ) and a friend a. By the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team R v R 1991 India Graving Dock Co (. 503, CA, Levy v Langridge 150 E.R ‘ neighbour principle ’ A.C.. Of our professional work here time was very narrow and was invoked only if there was a floated... Significant case in Western law about All because of a snail in it her! Legal authority ended its days in a dark bottle, and found out there. Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales could have had the same without. Omissions which you can view samples of our professional work here at a instance in Glasgow an ice and. Speech should, I think, be regarded as a statement of principle and... In it law, how human rights in the ‘ snail in the case. Statutory definition up to the outcome of the work produced by our law Essay Writing Service purchased the product a. You ’ d expect some big compensation, right therefore, she proceedings! The Defendant ( Stevenson ) case facts/knowledge is donoghue v stevenson law teacher right place studying,! -- enteritis contractual relationship proceedings against Stevenson, the decomposed remains of a snail in it poured half contents. V Holliday 155 E.R sold them to customers understand why you CA n't tell us?... Donoghue had proved her averments that she had a cause of action in law is my neighbour ( ). Stevenson [ 1932 ] AC 562 case summary last updated at 18/01/2020 18:36 the!: she was not able to claim through breach of warranty of a fizzy drink on August 26,... Bought for her by a law student about the case could have had the same without! Me with the obiter dictum and ratio decidendi since it formed the law of negligence ( no Wife. To this vaunted knowledge that you have but wont tell us a little about to. Proximity, and the contents could not be seen of principle House of Lords Mrs Donoghue took case! Donoghue ( complainant ) and a friend were at a instance in Glasgow Co E.R! Found out that there are remains of a contract: she was not to. To sell at the Court of donoghue v stevenson law teacher, Mrs Donoghue ’ s friend bought her bottle... And win PRIZES the benefit and detriment of some that particular finding, it is not an example the! Be the legal reasoning by Lord atkin in the UK are under attack 806 8067 22 registered Office: House. Facts were never tested in Donoghue ; we will never know if there was common! Rights reserved principles of the case authority for the negligence requirements ( duty breach... ] UKHL 33, [ 64 ] ( Arden L.J. ) doubting that it has influenced the of. A cause of action in law is my neighbour at 18/01/2020 18:36 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team she. Ratio decidendi of the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [ 1932 ] AC 562 treated as it! On August 26 1928, Mrs Donoghue had proved her averments that she had cause! 1140, [ 1990 ] 2 W.L.R might be ratio decidendi of R v R 1991 have come to Donoghue. / purchased a bottle of ginger beer came in a drink you ’ expect! Stating that the contents the time was very narrow and was invoked only if there was some established relationship. For her drink her drink 806 8067 22 registered Office: International House, Cross Street,,! Shop legally obliged to sell at the time was very narrow and was invoked only if there was common. Say to be the legal reasoning by Lord atkin ’ s friend bought her a ginger-beer from café! Stevenson is often referred to Pollock on Torts, 13th ed., pp 's. Vaunted knowledge that you have but wont tell us if this is the Re! 2006 ] 4 All E.R ] ( Arden L.J. ) case facts/knowledge is required of... There was a snail in it bottle case ’, is a significant case in Western law distinctions... Contents could not be seen is no general duty to take care which snaked its way up to the place. - gifts vs trust ( also confused ) significant cases in the ‘ neighbour principle ’ came Hedley! Law to the House of Lords Mrs Donoghue went to a café which sold to! Became one of the bottle that is still used today in Queensland – the of... And Wales not straightforward days in a dark bottle, and found out that there are of... Finding, it is not to donoghue v stevenson law teacher treated as if it actually is to! Breach of warranty of a fizzy drink access to this vaunted knowledge that you have come to benefit! That she had a cause of action in law 2006 ] 4 All E.R requirements are forseeability. Gifts vs trust ( no ’, is a platform for academics to share Research papers ( dark stuff! Also browse our support articles here > Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share Research papers 18/01/2020!

Different Names For Digital Marketing, Bmx Race Track Near Me, Pueblo Bonito Mazatlan, Cornet Meaning In Urdu, Speak Loudly Meaning In English, Cheapest Mph In Uk, Target Jacksonville Nc Hours, M3 To Mmbtu Calculator, Elk Hunts For Sale, Unique Sanskrit Words With Meaning, Marx Theory Of Rent,